<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Integralist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.integralist.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk</link>
	<description>Web Development and Integral Theory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:54:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GZIP your HTML, CSS and JavaScript with PHP by Nicholas Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/php/gzip-your-html-css-and-javascript-with-php/comment-page-1/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integralist.co.uk/?p=16#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much! I really appreciated your tips!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much! I really appreciated your tips!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Panentheistic Account of Evolution by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/integral-theory/a-panentheistic-account-of-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integralist.co.uk/?p=37#comment-966</guid>
		<description>&quot;How exactly can one live with peace-of-mind when there are literally thousands of reasons not to&quot;...
Check out this video by Ken Wilber, hopefully it&#039;ll help explain my own thoughts on the matter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TUr949kmZk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How exactly can one live with peace-of-mind when there are literally thousands of reasons not to&#8221;&#8230; </p>
<p>Check out this video by Ken Wilber, hopefully it&#8217;ll help explain my own thoughts on the matter: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TUr949kmZk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TUr949kmZk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Panentheistic Account of Evolution by James</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/integral-theory/a-panentheistic-account-of-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integralist.co.uk/?p=37#comment-885</guid>
		<description>My mind is hovering between abstract pondering and the harsh reality of the human condition, or rather the conditions of the societies we’ve formed. So, forgive me, but I’m not entirely sure on what plain of thought I should be responding in.
Why is my mind not at peace? I feel there is something lacking, some place I should be, or some home that I must return to. Cynthia’s comment hit home with me – especially the last paragraph.
I don’t entirely understand the notion of panentheism or even how it differs to pantheism (apart from the semantic difference), but I am certain of one thing (or as certain as I can be) – it really doesn’t matter.
And this is what I struggle with. Trying to find meaning in a circumstance devoid of intent (and therefore meaning) seems like an endless barrage on my mind.
How exactly can one live with peace-of-mind when there are literally thousands of reasons not to, but only a slight inkling that we should?
“...until that day when each individual comes to realise their own true nature.” – I’m waiting patiently for this day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mind is hovering between abstract pondering and the harsh reality of the human condition, or rather the conditions of the societies we’ve formed. So, forgive me, but I’m not entirely sure on what plain of thought I should be responding in.</p>
<p>Why is my mind not at peace? I feel there is something lacking, some place I should be, or some home that I must return to. Cynthia’s comment hit home with me – especially the last paragraph.</p>
<p>I don’t entirely understand the notion of panentheism or even how it differs to pantheism (apart from the semantic difference), but I am certain of one thing (or as certain as I can be) – it really doesn’t matter.</p>
<p>And this is what I struggle with. Trying to find meaning in a circumstance devoid of intent (and therefore meaning) seems like an endless barrage on my mind. </p>
<p>How exactly can one live with peace-of-mind when there are literally thousands of reasons not to, but only a slight inkling that we should? </p>
<p>“&#8230;until that day when each individual comes to realise their own true nature.” – I’m waiting patiently for this day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Panentheistic Account of Evolution by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/integral-theory/a-panentheistic-account-of-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integralist.co.uk/?p=37#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Personally I try not to grasp onto ideas such as &#039;me&#039;, &#039;us&#039;, &#039;them&#039; - or any other kind phrase that brings about the acceptance of a duality. Separation from each other (our true Self) is suffering.
In the Zen/Buddhist traditions we are all considered a part of a single non-dualistic consciousness, a singularity that does nothing but watch, and is able to observe every little thing (emotion, thought, physical item) objectively and have it spread through its infinite awareness. With this as our sole expression, then there is no home to go to. There is nothing lacking. Everything that happens, happens. We sit and watch in absolute un waiver&#039;ing peace.
To some this is a terrifying idea, almost selfish. They already feel disconnected from this way of perceiving existence. So they instantly disagree with the *actual* point which this belief represents, and mistakenly sees it as an abandonment of responsibility of each human individual/spirit to do the right thing in life and to learn to get along and look after this planet we have (so far) done nothing but abuse.
So, although I agree with the sentiment that &quot;...we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively&quot; (rip Bill Hicks) I also strongly believe in the responsibility of each individuals own actions. Moral intelligence isn&#039;t something that we are born with, we must be taught. And so I think as a community it is our moral obligation to encourage better understanding and provide greater perspectives on all of life&#039;s intricacies, moment to moment, until that day when each individual comes to realise their own true nature.
It is not good enough to leave it to the mother to teach her children, we must help and encourage both mother and child. That is the responsibility we need to start accepting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I try not to grasp onto ideas such as &#8216;me&#8217;, &#8216;us&#8217;, &#8216;them&#8217; &#8211; or any other kind phrase that brings about the acceptance of a duality. Separation from each other (our true Self) is suffering. </p>
<p>In the Zen/Buddhist traditions we are all considered a part of a single non-dualistic consciousness, a singularity that does nothing but watch, and is able to observe every little thing (emotion, thought, physical item) objectively and have it spread through its infinite awareness. With this as our sole expression, then there is no home to go to. There is nothing lacking. Everything that happens, happens. We sit and watch in absolute un waiver&#8217;ing peace.</p>
<p>To some this is a terrifying idea, almost selfish. They already feel disconnected from this way of perceiving existence. So they instantly disagree with the *actual* point which this belief represents, and mistakenly sees it as an abandonment of responsibility of each human individual/spirit to do the right thing in life and to learn to get along and look after this planet we have (so far) done nothing but abuse.</p>
<p>So, although I agree with the sentiment that &#8220;&#8230;we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively&#8221; (rip Bill Hicks) I also strongly believe in the responsibility of each individuals own actions. Moral intelligence isn&#8217;t something that we are born with, we must be taught. And so I think as a community it is our moral obligation to encourage better understanding and provide greater perspectives on all of life&#8217;s intricacies, moment to moment, until that day when each individual comes to realise their own true nature. </p>
<p>It is not good enough to leave it to the mother to teach her children, we must help and encourage both mother and child. That is the responsibility we need to start accepting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Panentheistic Account of Evolution by Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/integral-theory/a-panentheistic-account-of-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integralist.co.uk/?p=37#comment-882</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read this story somewhere before, but it was written differently.  This one is a more &quot;rock &amp; roll&quot; version of the one I read about 20 years ago.  Its beautiful but it leaves me sad because it leaves out the indifference of the spirit which inhabits this planet.
Gaia is indifferent and to some of us humans, it is painful.  Gaia is sorta like the mother who is so used to her children screaming and running around hurting each other that she just lets them.  When others, like me, see her kids acting so abhorrently toward one another and look to her to teach them better, we may feel like she is a neglectful mother.  But that&#039;s our perspective.  She knows her children will learn from themselves.  She was only there to birth them and provide the material necessities of life.
But I struggle with this &quot;hands-off&quot; approach to motherhood.  Read Lord of the Flies.  Human children are the cruelest of creatures.  I think the children of Earth may off themselves with their own cruelty and neglect for the environment in which they live.  This saddens me and makes me wonder just what the point is.
So what&#039;s the point of all the suffering?  For me, apparently, its acceptance.  If I can&#039;t just accept that these humans behave childishly and continue to think I can be a better mother than Gaia to them, I will live a continually miserable life. This was when I gave up on activism.
So I realize I don&#039;t normally incarnate here. This was a special trip. I don&#039;t like it here.  I wanna go home.  I cannot be indifferent like Gaia.  I am human.  I feel.  I grieve knowing that it is the law of this place that if one shall prosper here, others must suffer.
How do you handle it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read this story somewhere before, but it was written differently.  This one is a more &#8220;rock &amp; roll&#8221; version of the one I read about 20 years ago.  Its beautiful but it leaves me sad because it leaves out the indifference of the spirit which inhabits this planet.  </p>
<p>Gaia is indifferent and to some of us humans, it is painful.  Gaia is sorta like the mother who is so used to her children screaming and running around hurting each other that she just lets them.  When others, like me, see her kids acting so abhorrently toward one another and look to her to teach them better, we may feel like she is a neglectful mother.  But that&#8217;s our perspective.  She knows her children will learn from themselves.  She was only there to birth them and provide the material necessities of life.  </p>
<p>But I struggle with this &#8220;hands-off&#8221; approach to motherhood.  Read Lord of the Flies.  Human children are the cruelest of creatures.  I think the children of Earth may off themselves with their own cruelty and neglect for the environment in which they live.  This saddens me and makes me wonder just what the point is. </p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the point of all the suffering?  For me, apparently, its acceptance.  If I can&#8217;t just accept that these humans behave childishly and continue to think I can be a better mother than Gaia to them, I will live a continually miserable life. This was when I gave up on activism.</p>
<p>So I realize I don&#8217;t normally incarnate here. This was a special trip. I don&#8217;t like it here.  I wanna go home.  I cannot be indifferent like Gaia.  I am human.  I feel.  I grieve knowing that it is the law of this place that if one shall prosper here, others must suffer.  </p>
<p>How do you handle it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calling an ActionScript function from JavaScript by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/actionscript/calling-an-actionscript-function-from-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.integralist.co.uk/?p=214#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Is there any reason why you&#039;re not using SWFObject which is considered the de facto standard for inserting Flash content into a web page, your problem might have something to do with how it&#039;s being inserted using your own jQuery code. To be honest I couldn&#039;t tell very much from the sample of code you provided so I&#039;m not able to help further on what you&#039;ve given here.
Just to be clear is it the JavaScript  function that is causing the error? It might be you&#039;re clicking on the button in your Flash movie before the JavaScript code has finished downloading/processing hence why the function is coming back &#039;undefined&#039;. You would have to implement some form of &#039;polling&#039; code to constantly check when the JavaScript method becomes available.
Sorry I can&#039;t be of more help at this stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any reason why you&#8217;re not using SWFObject which is considered the de facto standard for inserting Flash content into a web page, your problem might have something to do with how it&#8217;s being inserted using your own jQuery code. To be honest I couldn&#8217;t tell very much from the sample of code you provided so I&#8217;m not able to help further on what you&#8217;ve given here.</p>
<p>Just to be clear is it the JavaScript  function that is causing the error? It might be you&#8217;re clicking on the button in your Flash movie before the JavaScript code has finished downloading/processing hence why the function is coming back &#8216;undefined&#8217;. You would have to implement some form of &#8216;polling&#8217; code to constantly check when the JavaScript method becomes available.</p>
<p>Sorry I can&#8217;t be of more help at this stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calling an ActionScript function from JavaScript by brian</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/actionscript/calling-an-actionscript-function-from-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 02:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.integralist.co.uk/?p=214#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have a flash movie with a method that can be called from javascript, also I use the ExternalInterface register the method.
My problem is: if I put the flash movie on page before the page is loading, I can invoke the flash method successful. But if I load the flash using jquery after the page has been loaded, I got the error say the method is undefined.
Can you tell me what is wrong? Any way I can solve this problem?
My code I used to load the flash is like the following:
function DispBannerEditor(movie) {
            $(&quot;#divBannerEditor&quot;).empty();
            var mv = &quot;&quot;;
            mv = mv + &quot;&quot;;
            mv = mv + &quot;&quot;;
            mv = mv + &quot;&quot;;
            mv = mv + &quot;&quot;;
            mv = mv + &quot;&quot;;
            mv = mv + &quot;&quot;;
            $(&quot;#divBannerEditor&quot;).append(mv);
        }
This javascript method will be called in a mouse click event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have a flash movie with a method that can be called from javascript, also I use the ExternalInterface register the method.</p>
<p>My problem is: if I put the flash movie on page before the page is loading, I can invoke the flash method successful. But if I load the flash using jquery after the page has been loaded, I got the error say the method is undefined. </p>
<p>Can you tell me what is wrong? Any way I can solve this problem?</p>
<p>My code I used to load the flash is like the following:</p>
<p>function DispBannerEditor(movie) {</p>
<p>            $(&#8220;#divBannerEditor&#8221;).empty();<br />
            var mv = &#8220;&#8221;;<br />
            mv = mv + &#8220;&#8221;;<br />
            mv = mv + &#8220;&#8221;;<br />
            mv = mv + &#8220;&#8221;;<br />
            mv = mv + &#8220;&#8221;;<br />
            mv = mv + &#8220;&#8221;;<br />
            mv = mv + &#8220;&#8221;;<br />
            $(&#8220;#divBannerEditor&#8221;).append(mv);</p>
<p>        }</p>
<p>This javascript method will be called in a mouse click event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grab HTML fragment with AJAX by TwoHawks</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/javascript/grab-html-fragment-with-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>TwoHawks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.integralist.co.uk/?p=275#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Hey Mark, thank you for sharing that.  I wish to point out to others finding this place under similar investigation as I that... well, I was tearing my hair out trying to figure out how to use responseXML method to work for pulling nodes from my html files, thinking that would be the efficient approach; however, after much searching testing and learning it appears that using responseText, which is what your method appears to be essentially based on, is the &#039;free&#039;-way to go, as handling XML nodes has some stringent requirements and is going to make you jump through hoops to get it to work with anything not plainly being served up as xml content-type.
Although I am using completely differnt code than you are sharing here, the method is an important good one for visitors to consider.
Cheers, TwoHawks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mark, thank you for sharing that.  I wish to point out to others finding this place under similar investigation as I that&#8230; well, I was tearing my hair out trying to figure out how to use responseXML method to work for pulling nodes from my html files, thinking that would be the efficient approach; however, after much searching testing and learning it appears that using responseText, which is what your method appears to be essentially based on, is the &#8216;free&#8217;-way to go, as handling XML nodes has some stringent requirements and is going to make you jump through hoops to get it to work with anything not plainly being served up as xml content-type.</p>
<p>Although I am using completely differnt code than you are sharing here, the method is an important good one for visitors to consider.<br />
Cheers, TwoHawks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inheritance in JavaScript by M.</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/javascript/inheritance-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integralist.co.uk/?p=9#comment-3</guid>
		<description>@Shane Thanks for the comments. The point you raised about PHP being a &#039;programming&#039; language although it isn&#039;t compiled is actually a subject of much disagreement with some people, so I&#039;ll leave it up to others to voice their opinions on that one.
But I appreciate your clarification of the JavaScript language as an &#039;interpreted&#039; language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shane Thanks for the comments. The point you raised about PHP being a &#8216;programming&#8217; language although it isn&#8217;t compiled is actually a subject of much disagreement with some people, so I&#8217;ll leave it up to others to voice their opinions on that one.</p>
<p>But I appreciate your clarification of the JavaScript language as an &#8216;interpreted&#8217; language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inheritance in JavaScript by Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.integralist.co.uk/javascript/inheritance-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integralist.co.uk/?p=9#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s not really what this post is about, but I think your definition of a &quot;scripting&quot; language not being a programming language is a bit off.
There are many languages that aren&#039;t compiled before you run them, but they&#039;re still &quot;programming&quot; languages. Like PHP and Python. A better way of saying what you want is saying that Javascript is an interpreted language, rather than a compiled one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s not really what this post is about, but I think your definition of a &#8220;scripting&#8221; language not being a programming language is a bit off.</p>
<p>There are many languages that aren&#8217;t compiled before you run them, but they&#8217;re still &#8220;programming&#8221; languages. Like PHP and Python. A better way of saying what you want is saying that Javascript is an interpreted language, rather than a compiled one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
